Clinical trial evaluating apomorphine oromucosal solution in Parkinson's disease patients.

Apomorphine, used to treat OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), is typically administered via subcutaneous injections. Administration of an oromucosal solution could offer a non-invasive and user-friendly alternative. This two-part clinical study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dose proportionality of a novel apomorphine hydrochloride oromucosal solution, as well as its relative bioavailability to subcutaneous apomorphine injection and apomorphine sublingual film. In part A of the study, 12 patients with PD received 2 mg oromucosal apomorphine (4% weight/volume) and 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 4 and 8 mg oromucosal apomorphine. In part B of the study, 13 patients with PD received 7 mg oromucosal apomorphine (7% weight/volume) and 30 mg sublingual apomorphine in a randomized order, followed by 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine. Washout between dose administrations in both study parts was at least 2 days. Safety, tolerability, and PK were assessed pre- and post-dose. Both study parts showed that oromucosal apomorphine was generally well-tolerated. Observed side effects were typical for apomorphine administration and included asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension, yawning, fatigue, and somnolence. Oromucosal apomorphine exposure increased with dose, although less than dose proportional. The mean (SD) maximum exposure reached with 14 mg oromucosal apomorphine was 753.0 (298.6) ng*min/mL (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity) and 8.0 (3.3) ng/mL (maximum plasma concentration). This was comparable to exposure reached after 2 mg subcutaneous apomorphine and approximately half of the exposure observed with 30 mg sublingual apomorphine. In summary, clinically relevant plasma concentrations could be reached in PD patients without tolerability issues.

A deep eutectic-based, self-emulsifying subcutaneous depot system for apomorphine therapy in Parkinson's disease.

Apomorphine, a dopamine agonist, is a highly effective therapeutic to prevent intermittent off episodes in advanced Parkinson's disease. However, its short systemic half-life necessitates three injections per day. Such a frequent dosing regimen imposes a significant compliance challenge, especially given the nature of the disease. Here, we report a deep eutectic-based formulation that slows the release of apomorphine after subcutaneous injection and extends its pharmacokinetics to convert the current three-injections-a-day therapy into an every-other-day therapy. The formulation comprises a homogeneous mixture of a deep eutectic solvent choline-geranate, a cosolvent n-methyl-pyrrolidone, a stabilizer polyethylene glycol, and water, which spontaneously emulsifies into a microemulsion upon injection in the subcutaneous space, thereby entrapping apomorphine and significantly slowing its release. Ex vivo studies with gels and rat skin demonstrate this self-emulsification process as the mechanism of action for sustained release. In vivo pharmacokinetics studies in rats and pigs further confirmed the extended release and improvement over the clinical comparator Apokyn. In vivo pharmacokinetics, supported by a pharmacokinetic simulation, demonstrate that the deep eutectic formulation reported here allows the maintenance of the therapeutic drug concentration in plasma in humans with a dosing regimen of approximately three injections per week compared to the current clinical practice of three injections per day.

Pycnogenol ameliorates motor function and gene expressions of NF-ƙB and Nrf2 in a 6-hydroxydopamine-induced experimental model of Parkinson's disease in male NMRI mice.

We investigated the effect of Pycnogenol as an antioxidant on improving motor function, depression, and the expression of NF-ƙB and Nrf2 genes in the experimental model of Parkinson's disease. Forty adult male NMRI mice weighing about 30 g were randomly divided into five groups of eight. Saline group: received 3 µl of saline, as 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) solvent, unilaterally in the left striatum, treatment groups: first received 3 µl 6-OHDA unilaterally inside the ipsilateral striatum and then divided into subgroup A: received distilled water, Pycnogenol solvent, by gavage for 7 days (lesion group), and subgroup B: received Pycnogenol at doses of 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg by gavage for 7 days. Seven days after Parkinson's model induction, the apomorphine test, the degree of catalepsy by bar test, the duration of immobility (depression) by forced swimming test (FST) were measured. In addition, the expression of NF-ƙB and Nrf2 genes was measured using the real-time PCR technique. The total number of rotations in the apomorphine test decreased significantly in the groups receiving Pycnogenol. Administration of Pycnogenol significantly reduced catalepsy. The study of depression in the group receiving Pycnogenol showed a significant reduction. Also, Pycnogenol increased the expression of the Nrf2 anti-inflammatory gene, but it had no significant difference in the expression of NF-ƙB gene. Pycnogenol, presumably with its antioxidative and genomic effects, improves the expression of the anti-inflammatory gene and found that neuroprotection effect in the brain.

New dopaminergic therapies for PD motor complications.

BACKGROUND: Motor complications, characterized by "off" periods - when anti-parkinsonian medications are ineffective - and dyskinesia, are the hallmark of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). While levodopa is the gold standard PD medication in terms of efficacy, its short duration of effect coupled with progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons leads to motor complications and fails to treat off periods. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on novel dopaminergic therapies that were recently made clinically available or are currently in development for the treatment of motor complications. First, it will discuss rescue therapies for the treatment of off episodes, including novel apomorphine and levodopa formulations. Second, it will highlight adjunctive dopaminergic medications approved to reduce total daily off time. Third, it will discuss longer-acting levodopa formulations in development and introduce a novel selective dopamine agonist under study. Finally, it will cover novel dopaminergic delivery mechanisms, with specific focus on continuous subcutaneous infusions in development. SUMMARY: The breadth of dopaminergic therapies recently approved or in development for motor complications, and specifically off time reduction, evokes cautious optimism. Gains in reducing off time with rescue therapies, adjunctive medications or longer-acting levodopa formulations are modest, and underscore the need for more continuous dopaminergic delivery to address the underlying pathophysiology and translate to clinically meaningful improvement in motor complications.

Dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film for treating "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Apomorphine sublingual film is approved for the "on-demand" treatment of "OFF" episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients must undergo dose titration to determine their most effective and tolerable dose. We assessed whether higher doses than those that provide an initial "ON" response could yield more effective treatment. METHODS: Patients with PD were assessed in the "OFF" state and the apomorphine sublingual film dose was titrated to a level that provided a tolerable "ON" response. The dose was then increased by up to two dose levels, if tolerated. A comparison in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III scores was made following administration of the dose that provided the initial "ON" response and following the higher dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also reported. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were titrated to higher apomorphine sublingual film doses than those that provided an initial "ON" response. A mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS Part III score was observed compared with the initial dose of 5.6 points (P = 0.034), 4.4 points (P = 0.009), and 3.7 points (P = 0.018) at 30, 60, and 90 min postdose, respectively. Adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved with dose reduction without concomitant treatment. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of apomorphine sublingual film than those initially perceived to provide an "ON" response can be tolerated and provide additional improvement in motor function in many patients.

Early factors for predicting discontinuation to subcutaneous Apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease: A prospective analysis of the Thai Apomorphine Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Although continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) with motor fluctuations, data from Asian cohorts is limited. The therapy is often discontinued due to the complexity of its delivery. METHODS: Fifty-one PD patients undergoing CSAI as an add-on therapy were enrolled in the Thai Apomorphine Registry, an electronic database that recorded clinical characteristics and parameters during the 14-consecutive-day titration and long-term follow-up. Factors at the time of titration were documented in order to identify predictors of long-term discontinuation. RESULTS: Following initiation, PD patients were administered a mean CSAI dose of 5.89 mg/h (SD 1.36) over a mean time of 12.28 h (SD 1.90) each day. The mean follow-up period was 626.2 days (SD 619.17). Significant reductions in UPDRS-I, II, III, and IV scores, total NMSQ score, PDQ-8 score, daily off and dyskinesia hours, Timed Up and Go test, walking step test, levodopa-equivalent daily dose, number of times a day the levodopa was taken versus pre-CSAI values were observed (p < 0.05, each). Thirty-five (68.6%) patients discontinued during the follow-up period. Relative risks of variables recorded at the time of titration that determined discontinuation of CSAI therapy were an absence of full-time caregivers, achieving a daily off hours reduction <3.5 h, and NMSQ scores at the time of CSAI titration ≥9.5 points. CONCLUSION: Identifying factors that predict discontinuation of CSAI at the time of its initiation may help physicians to better understand the patient's drug response and how to manage them long-term.

Induction of emesis with apomorphine using a novel gingival administration method in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel method of inducing emesis in the dog using gingival administration of apomorphine, compare the efficacy of inducing emesis with gingival apomorphine to conjunctival apomorphine, and describe adverse effects associated with the gingival route. DESIGN: Retrospective study from January 2017 to September 2018. SETTING: Independent all-hours primary and secondary emergency and critical care referral center. ANIMALS: Five hundred fifty-eight client-owned dogs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The medical records of dogs presenting for induction of emesis were searched. Dogs receiving either gingival or conjunctival apomorphine were included in the study. A short online survey was sent to clients whose dogs received gingival apomorphine. Apomorphine was administered conjunctivally in 430 (77.1%) dogs and gingivally in 128 (22.9%) dogs. There was no difference between route of administration and success of emesis (p = 0.29). A total of 14 clients responded to the survey, and diarrhea, lethargy, hyperactivity, and sedation were reported as adverse effects of gingival apomorphine administration. No clients sought veterinary attention for any of the adverse effects reported. CONCLUSIONS: Gingival administration of apomorphine is easy, appears to be safe, and is an effective method of inducing emesis in the dog. Gingival administration of apomorphine may be considered in cases where parenteral administration is not feasible and could replace conjunctival administration in compliant dogs.

Treatment of subcutaneous nodules after infusion of apomorphine; a biopsy-controlled study comparing 4 frequently used therapies.

This study aimed to provide clinical evidence for existing treatments of subcutaneous nodules after subcutaneous infusion of apomorphine, using a biopsy-controlled prospective crossover design of four treatments. We demonstrated that dilution of apomorphine significantly improved patient satisfaction, while subcutaneous hydrocortisone reduced nodule size, however with no differences in the histopathology.

On demand therapy for Parkinson's disease patients: Opportunities and choices.

Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), but a major treatment challenge is that over time, many patients experience periods of return of PD symptoms intermittently through the day, known as OFF periods. OFF periods typically manifest as a return of motor symptoms but can also involve non-motor symptoms and these periods can disrupt good control despite optimization of the oral levodopa regimen. OFF periods emerge in large measure due to a shortening of the duration of clinical benefit from oral levodopa, thought to be related to a progressive loss of dopamine neurons and their ability to store and release levodopa-derived dopamine over many hours. The problem is further compounded by impaired absorption of oral levodopa due to gastroparesis and other factors limiting its uptake in the small intestine, including competition for uptake by meals and their protein content. On-demand therapies are now available for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD and are administered intermittently, on an as-needed basis, on top of the patient's maintenance medication regimen. To be useful, an on-demand medication should take effect more rapidly and reliably than oral levodopa. Options for on-demand therapy for OFF periods have recently increased with the approval of levodopa inhalation powder and sublingual apomorphine as alternatives to the older option of subcutaneous apomorphine injection, each of which avoids the gastrointestinal tract and its potential for absorption delay. On-demand therapy is now available for patients experiencing episodic or intermittent need for rapid and reliable onset of benefit. On-demand therapy may also provide an alternative to more invasive treatment such as infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel and for patients whose OFF episodes are not controlled despite deep brain stimulation.

Apomorfina: un poderoso aliado en la enfermedad de Parkinson / Apomorphine: a powerful ally in Parkinson’s disease

Introducción: La apomorfina, agonista dopaminérgico D1 y D2, es el fármaco más antiguo con efectividad en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) y el único de potencia análoga a la levodopa. Su utilidad, tanto en la administración intermitente como en la perfusión continua en el control de las fluctuaciones motoras, está demostrada tanto en estudios abiertos como controlados. Objetivo: Analizar el papel de la apomorfina en las distintas manifestaciones y momentos evolutivos de la EP mediante una revisión narrativa de la literatura científica (1951-2020). Desarrollo: Más allá del aumento de la duración del on, la reducción del off, la mejoría de la distonía en off y la calidad de vida en pacientes con EP avanzada, existe evidencia de la efectividad de la apomorfina en áreas menos conocidas de la EP, como síntomas no motores, menor riesgo de inducir trastornos de control de impulsos, potencial para atenuar las alucinaciones visuales, mejora de la clínica neuropsiquiátrica asociada a la EP, ayuda a un mejor control de las discinesias o influencia en los síntomas axiales. Sin embargo, el momento óptimo de su instauración sigue siendo objeto de debate, y existen varios factores que históricamente han limitado el uso de este valioso fármaco. Conclusiones: La apomorfina es un fármaco con propiedades únicas dentro del abanico de posibilidades para tratar la EP, con potenciales aplicaciones más allá del control de las fluctuaciones motoras. Conocerlas para indicarlas a los pacientes que más puedan beneficiarse de ellos, así como valorar adecuadamente el estadio de la EP en que iniciar la apomorfina, puede ser clave para mejorar el control clínico de esta compleja patología.(AU)

Introduction: Apomorphine, a D1-D2 dopamine agonist, is the oldest drug with proven efficacy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD), and the only with similar symptomatic power to levodopa. Its usefulness in the control of motor fluctuations, both as intermittent injections and in continuous subcutaneous infusion, has been demonstrated in open label and placebo controlled trials. Aim: To analyse the role of apomorphine in the varied clinical symptoms and different clinical stages of PD through a narrative review of scientific literature (1951-2020). Development: Beyond on-time increase, off-time decrease, off dystonia and quality of life improvement in advanced PD, there is evidence to support a role of apomorphine in less known clinical areas of PD, such as non motor symptoms, a lower risk of impulse control disorders, potential to ameliorate visual hallucinations, improve neuropsychiatric symptoms and dyskinesia and even axial features. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of apomorphine treatment remains controversial, and its implementation of this valuable drug in clinical practice has been historically hindered by several factors. Conclusions: Apomorphine is a unique drug in the PD treatment scenario, with a number of potential applications beyond motor fluctuations control. Acknowledging these properties, selecting the patient most likely to benefit from it and finding the right timing may be key in the symptomatic control of this complex disease.(AU)

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of apomorphine sublingual film or subcutaneous apomorphine in healthy subjects and patients with Parkinson's disease.

Apomorphine is an on-demand treatment of "OFF" episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). A joint parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetic (PK) model characterized apomorphine and apomorphine-sulfate following administration of apomorphine sublingual film (APL) and two formulations of subcutaneous apomorphine. Overall, 2485 samples from 87 healthy subjects and 71 patients with PD and "OFF" episodes were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Apomorphine PK was adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order transit absorption via both routes of administration and first-order metabolism to apomorphine-sulfate with one-compartment disposition and first-order elimination. Bioavailability of apomorphine sublingual film was ~ 18% relative to subcutaneous apomorphine. Among covariates tested, only body weight had a large effect on apomorphine exposure (maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC0-∞ ]), with greater weight resulting in lower exposure. Model-predicted apomorphine exposure was similar between apomorphine sublingual film 30 mg and subcutaneous apomorphine 5 mg (median AUC0-24 , 66.7 ng•h/mL, geometric mean ratio of 0.99; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.03) and was comparable between apomorphine sublingual film 35 mg and subcutaneous apomorphine 6 mg (median AUC0-24 , 75.4 and 80.0 ng•h/mL, respectively; geometric mean ratio of 0.94; 90% CI, 0.90-0.97) administered every 2 h for a maximum of 5 doses per day. In a typical patient with PD, predicted apomorphine exposure increased with increasing doses of apomorphine sublingual film; however, the increase was less than dose proportional. Similar apomorphine exposure was predicted in patients with mild renal impairment versus normal renal function. PK properties of apomorphine sublingual film support its administration for a wide range of patients with PD and "OFF" episodes, regardless of demographic and clinical characteristics.

Long-term safety and efficacy of apomorphine infusion in Parkinson's disease patients with persistent motor fluctuations: Results of the open-label phase of the TOLEDO study.

INTRODUCTION: The randomized, double-blind phase (DBP) of the TOLEDO study confirmed the efficacy of apomorphine infusion (APO) in reducing OFF time in PD patients with persistent motor fluctuations despite optimized oral/transdermal therapy. Here we report safety and efficacy results including the 52-week open-label phase (OLP). METHODS: All patients completing the 12-week DBP (including those switching early to open-label treatment) were offered OLP entry. The primary objective was the evaluation of long-term safety of APO. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients entered the OLP (40 previously on APO, 44 on placebo) and 59 patients (70.2%) completed the study. The safety profile of APO was consistent with experience from extensive clinical use. Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate infusion site nodules, somnolence and nausea. Fourteen (16.7%) patients discontinued the OLP due to AEs, those involving >1 patient were infusion site reactions (n = 4) and fatigue (n = 2); hemolytic anemia occurred in one case. Reduction in daily OFF time and improvement in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia were sustained for up to 64 weeks. Pooled data for week 64 (n = 55) showed a mean (SD) change from DBP baseline in daily OFF time of -3.66 (2.72) hours and in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia of 3.31 (3.12) hours. Mean (±SD) daily levodopa-equivalent dose decreased from DBP baseline to week 64 by 543 mg (±674) and levodopa dose by 273 mg (±515). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of APO infusion were demonstrated with long-term use for persistent motor fluctuations, allowing substantial reductions in oral PD medication.

Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 counteracts L-NAME-induced catalepsy. BPC 157, L-NAME, L-arginine, NO-relation, in the suited rat acute and chronic models resembling 'positive-like' symptoms of schizophrenia.

In the suited rat-models, we focused on the stable pentadecapeptide BPC 157, L-NAME, NOS-inhibitor, and L-arginine, NOS-substrate, relation, the effect on schizophrenia-like symptoms. Medication (mg/kg intraperitoneally) was L-NAME (5), L-arginine (100), BPC 157 (0.01), given alone and/or together, at 5 min before the challenge for the acutely disturbed motor activity (dopamine-indirect/direct agonists (amphetamine (3.0), apomorphine (2.5)), NMDA-receptor non-competitive antagonist (MK-801 (0.2)), or catalepsy, (dopamine-receptor antagonist haloperidol (2.0)). Alternatively, BPC 157 10 µg/kg was given immediately after L-NAME 40 mg/kg intraperitoneally. To induce or prevent sensitization, we used chronic methamphetamine administration, alternating 3 days during the first 3 weeks, and challenge after next 4 weeks, and described medication (L-NAME, L-arginine, BPC 157) at 5 min before the methamphetamine at the second and third week. Given alone, BPC 157 or L-arginine counteracted the amphetamine-, apomorphine-, and MK-801-induced effect, haloperidol-induced catalepsy and chronic methamphetamine-induced sensitization. L-NAME did not affect the apomorphine-, and MK-801-induced effects, haloperidol-induced catalepsy and chronic methamphetamine-induced sensitization, but counteracted the acute amphetamine-induced effect. In combinations (L-NAME + L-arginine), as NO-specific counteraction, L-NAME counteracts L-arginine-induced counteractions in the apomorphine-, MK-801-, haloperidol- and methamphetamine-rats, but not in amphetamine-rats. Unlike L-arginine, BPC 157 maintains its counteracting effect in the presence of the NOS-blockade (L-NAME + BPC 157) or NO-system-over-stimulation (L-arginine + BPC 157). Illustrating the BPC 157-L-arginine relationships, BPC 157 restored the antagonization (L-NAME + L-arginine + BPC 157) when it had been abolished by the co-administration of L-NAME with L-arginine (L-NAME + L-arginine). Finally, BPC 157 directly inhibits the L-NAME high dose-induced catalepsy. Further studies would determine precise BPC 157/dopamine/glutamate/NO-system relationships and clinical application.

The Effect of Levosimendan on Two Distinct Rodent Models of Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by motor symptoms related to the deficiency in dopamine levels, and cognitive symptoms that are similar in nature to those manifested during Alzheimer's disease. Levosimendan, on the other hand, is a calcium sensitizer and phosphodiesterase inhibitor that was shown to possess neuroprotective, memoryenhancing, and anti-apoptotic properties. OBJECTIVE: In the current study, the possible protective effect of levosimendan was investigated in two animal models of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Both intracerebral injection 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) and the direct injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) into the substantia nigra were used as models to induce Parkinson's-like behavior. Levosimendan (12 µg/kg intraperitoneally once weekly) was started 7 days before or 2 days after lesioning of the animals. At day 14 post-lesioning, animals were subjected to apomorphine challenge, which was correlated with dopamine levels in the striatum and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive nigral cells. RESULTS: Results showed that levosimendan restored the number of rotations in the apomorphine challenge test, the levels of dopamine in the striatum, and the TH-positive nigral cells when administered 7 days before, but not two days after 6-OHDA lesioning. In the LPS model of PD, the number of rotations in the apomorphine challenge test, the levels of dopamine in the striatum, and the TH-positive nigral cells were restored when levosimendan was administered 7 days before as well as two days after lesioning. CONCLUSION: Levosimendan seems to provide a promising agent with potential clinical value for PD.

Evaluation of Prescription Practices of Domperidone in Parkinson's Disease: A Cross Sectional Study Among French Neurologists.

BACKGROUND: Domperidone is used to treat gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. Because of an increased risk of cardiac adverse events, the European Medicines Agency has issued recommendations restricting its use mainly in terms of age, dose, and treatment duration. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate current prescription practices of domperidone in Parkinson's disease among French neurologists. METHODS: A cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire was conducted among French neurologists from Parkinson's disease expert centers from the French NS-Park/FCRIN network, general hospitals, and private practice. RESULTS: Among the 253 neurologists who completed the questionnaire, 86 (34%) were physicians from expert centers and 167 (66%) were from other healthcare settings; 209 (83%) were aware of recommendations restricting domperidone use. The majority of neurologists (92%) declared prescribing domperidone regardless of the age of the patients. Sixty-one percent of neurologists prescribed domperidone beyond 7 days in newly diagnosed patients, 33% in patients with orthostatic hypotension, and 79% in patients receiving continuous apomorphine treatment. They did not follow the recommendation on posology in newly diagnosed patients (7% of neurologists), patients with orthostatic hypotension (10%), and patients receiving continuous apomorphine therapy (25%). Finally, only 58% of neurologists declared taking specific precautions before prescribing domperidone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show most French neurologists who responded to our questionnaire do not fully follow the restrictions on domperidone use, particularly in terms of treatment duration, and in patients receiving continuous apomorphine treatment. This may reflect the unmet need to prevent nausea in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with dopaminergic drugs, particularly continuous apomorphine therapy.

Restraint-induced behavioral deficits are attenuated or impaired by pre- or post-injection of apomorphine: A context-based study.

Apomorphine, a psycho stimulant, has neuroprotective effects due to its ability to decrease oxidative stress. Stress-induced dopaminergic dysfunction might lead to posttraumatic stress disorder, depression and related disorders. This dopaminergic dysfunction is more pre-dominant in basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex. Targeting of this dysfunction by psychostimulants, involves elevating dopamine in these brain regions and reduction of stress. On the other hand, stress itself can aggravate addictive effects to psycho stimulants. Present study was therefore designed to monitor the role of apomorphine in the attenuation of stress-induced behavioral deficits. Rats were exposed to 2hr restraint stress either before or after the apomorphine administration, to monitor effects of apomorphine administration on stress-induced behavioral deficits. Stress-induced decreases in food intake, growth rate and elevated plus maze activity were exacerbated if apomorphine was experienced during restraint stress. Conversely, these behavioral deficits were attenuated if apomorphine was experienced after restraint stress. It shows that apomorphine, if experienced during restraint stress, produces greater behavioral deficits, while the same were attenuated in rats receiving apomorphine after the termination of restraint stress. Results suggest that apomorphine and possibly the other CNS stimulants may help to cope stress by attenuating stress-induced behavioral deficits, if experienced after stress.

Open-label titration of apomorphine sublingual film in patients with Parkinson's disease and "OFF" episodes.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of apomorphine sublingual film (APL-130277; APL) for the on-demand treatment of "OFF" episodes associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) was demonstrated in a double-blind trial. Herein we describe the ability of patients to receive effective and tolerable APL dose titration during the open-label titration phase. METHODS: Adult patients with levodopa-responsive PD and "OFF" episodes were enrolled. In practically defined "OFF," patients were observed for a FULL "ON" after their usual morning carbidopa/levodopa (CD/LD) dose and then after titration with APL following each increasing dose (10-35 mg). Antiemetic medication was administered for 3 days before initiation of titration and was continued throughout titration. Motor responses were evaluated predose and postdose using Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III score. Safety outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 141 patients who enrolled in the study and received APL during open-label titration, 109 (77.3%) achieved a FULL "ON" (66.1% at 10-20 mg) and 10 did not. Patients who successfully completed APL dose titration tended to be younger, had a longer mean time since PD diagnosis, and had lower levodopa requirements than those who discontinued during titration for any reason. Change in MDS-UPDRS Part III scores from predose to 30 min postdose after titration with the effective dose of APL (n = 109) was similar across all dose groups. In a post hoc analysis, the magnitude of motor response with APL was ~2-fold higher than with CD/LD 15 min postdose, and the observed peak response occurred earlier with APL than with the trend seen for CD/LD (45 vs 90 min, respectively). Overall, the most common (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during APL dose titration were nausea (20.6%), yawning (12.1%), dizziness (11.3%), and somnolence (11.3%). Twelve patients discontinued due to TEAEs during APL dose titration, most commonly (≥2%) because of dizziness (2.8%), nausea (2.1%), and somnolence (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Among eligible patients with PD and "OFF" episodes who had their APL dose successfully titrated to an effective and tolerable level, most were able to do so within the first 3 titrated doses but some required further dose escalations. The use of APL can provide benefit for the treatment of "OFF" episodes.

The Choice Between Advanced Therapies for Parkinson's Disease Patients: Why, What, and When?

When oral dopaminergic medication falls short in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, patients are left with motor response fluctuations and dyskinesias that may have a large impact on functioning in daily life. They may benefit from one of the currently available advanced treatments, namely deep brain stimulation, continuous levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion. The indication, choice between the separate advanced treatments and the timing can be challenging and will be discussed against the background of the progressive nature of the disease, the heterogeneity of disease manifestation and variable patient characteristics.

An evaluation of subcutaneous apomorphine for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Heterogeneity of symptoms and individual variability of progression characterizes Parkinson's disease. Unmet therapeutic needs include a cure, disease modification, and improvement of available marketed dopamine-substituting compounds. Personalized treatment, tailored to the patients' needs and symptoms, aims to ameliorate impaired motor behavior and non-motor features. Injection or infusion of apomorphine is a therapeutic option for more advanced patients with severe levodopa associated motor complications. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review summarizes the subcutaneous administration, efficacy, and side effects of the non-ergot derivative dopamine agonist apomorphine following a non-systematic literature research. EXPERT OPINION: Subcutaneous apomorphine hydrochloride application rapidly terminates intervals with severe motor impairment with bolus injections. Oscillation of motor behavior well responds to continuous apomorphine infusions. Long-term application of the commercially available apomorphine hydrochloride solution sooner or later affects skin and oral mucosa. Onset of skin nodules associated with subcutaneous tissue inflammation probably results from the antioxidant preservative sodium metabisulfite in the apomorphine solution. Addition of another better tolerated and safer antioxidant instead of sodium metabisulphite or use of an already available concentrated apomorphine-free base formulation will enhance its future use, its tolerability, safety, and acceptance of subcutaneous and sublingual application.